<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two Kinds of Thickness in Abstract Painting</title>
	<link>http://thepaintingcenter.org/2007/04/09/two-kinds-of-thickness-in-abstract-painting/</link>
	<description>The Painting Center Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 12:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: robert straight</title>
		<link>http://thepaintingcenter.org/2007/04/09/two-kinds-of-thickness-in-abstract-painting/#comment-276</link>
		<author>robert straight</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 15:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thepaintingcenter.org/2007/04/09/two-kinds-of-thickness-in-abstract-painting/#comment-276</guid>
					<description>This is a very interesting and good take on painting.  I've felt for a while that in my work that I didn't want much surface in the work ( a reaction against the 80's expressionism) but recently I've been considering how the surface might become more pronounced without becoming expressionistic or simply impasto.
Thanks for your insightfulness.  You might also want to check out an interview I did with a site on the web
www.geoform.net
thanks, robert straight</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very interesting and good take on painting.  I&#8217;ve felt for a while that in my work that I didn&#8217;t want much surface in the work ( a reaction against the 80&#8217;s expressionism) but recently I&#8217;ve been considering how the surface might become more pronounced without becoming expressionistic or simply impasto.<br />
Thanks for your insightfulness.  You might also want to check out an interview I did with a site on the web<br />
<a href="http://www.geoform.net" rel="nofollow">www.geoform.net</a><br />
thanks, robert straight</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: f. brickhouse</title>
		<link>http://thepaintingcenter.org/2007/04/09/two-kinds-of-thickness-in-abstract-painting/#comment-458</link>
		<author>f. brickhouse</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 00:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thepaintingcenter.org/2007/04/09/two-kinds-of-thickness-in-abstract-painting/#comment-458</guid>
					<description>It's quite nice to read writing that seeks to understand the varied means and function of painting. Painting as Mr. Colaizzi states is complex, and any attempt to clarify seems to beg contradiction before a sentence is complete, yet that is the nature of the dialogue. Some thing about one of my students recent work bugged me, and trying to convey the reason why I felt I fell short and now here is some thinking I know I can send my student to that illuminates my concerns. For me there needs to be some epiphany in paint, a trace of how the imagery conveyed through paint was discovered and experienced by the artist themselves. Not a graphic notation of the language of experience but the mystery of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s quite nice to read writing that seeks to understand the varied means and function of painting. Painting as Mr. Colaizzi states is complex, and any attempt to clarify seems to beg contradiction before a sentence is complete, yet that is the nature of the dialogue. Some thing about one of my students recent work bugged me, and trying to convey the reason why I felt I fell short and now here is some thinking I know I can send my student to that illuminates my concerns. For me there needs to be some epiphany in paint, a trace of how the imagery conveyed through paint was discovered and experienced by the artist themselves. Not a graphic notation of the language of experience but the mystery of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TWO KINDS OF THICKNESS IN PAINTING by vittorio colaizzi &#171; MATTHEW HILYARD ART + DIALOGUE</title>
		<link>http://thepaintingcenter.org/2007/04/09/two-kinds-of-thickness-in-abstract-painting/#comment-471</link>
		<author>TWO KINDS OF THICKNESS IN PAINTING by vittorio colaizzi &#171; MATTHEW HILYARD ART + DIALOGUE</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 04:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thepaintingcenter.org/2007/04/09/two-kinds-of-thickness-in-abstract-painting/#comment-471</guid>
					<description>[...] Two Kinds of Thickness in Abstract Painting [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Two Kinds of Thickness in Abstract Painting [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Oschwald</title>
		<link>http://thepaintingcenter.org/2007/04/09/two-kinds-of-thickness-in-abstract-painting/#comment-1781</link>
		<author>Brian Oschwald</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 21:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thepaintingcenter.org/2007/04/09/two-kinds-of-thickness-in-abstract-painting/#comment-1781</guid>
					<description>Mr. V.,

Good clear disnctions.  Rather than being a one-off, would you say that the approach behind these these notes is evidence of an anlaytical method  - as such,  that can be brought to bear on other, related topics? I'd like to see and read more.

Regards, Brian Oschwald</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. V.,</p>
<p>Good clear disnctions.  Rather than being a one-off, would you say that the approach behind these these notes is evidence of an anlaytical method  - as such,  that can be brought to bear on other, related topics? I&#8217;d like to see and read more.</p>
<p>Regards, Brian Oschwald</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Daz Cox</title>
		<link>http://thepaintingcenter.org/2007/04/09/two-kinds-of-thickness-in-abstract-painting/#comment-1838</link>
		<author>Darren Daz Cox</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 03:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thepaintingcenter.org/2007/04/09/two-kinds-of-thickness-in-abstract-painting/#comment-1838</guid>
					<description>I've been working with thick acrylics over the past few years and, curiously enough, exploring the frame as part of the motif rather than it being merely a 'civilizing'  additional element.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been working with thick acrylics over the past few years and, curiously enough, exploring the frame as part of the motif rather than it being merely a &#8216;civilizing&#8217;  additional element.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
